What Is A Winchester 30 X 30 Lever Action Worth

Transparency and Canary WikiLeaks

'Fucking journalists

a political commentary in fiction drama "19:30." A play about corruption and illegal financing of political parties

management in the public sphere is essential to transparency. Transparency serves society to control the activity of public authorities, to prevent corrupt behavior deepen the level of democracy that is practiced. A low level of transparency in public affairs is very capable of leading to anti-democratic behavior. We have seen with the current housing crisis, which has created strong links between real estate agents and politicians who had the power to reclassify land between the racks of politics.

For this reason is unacceptable to highlight the actions that Wikileaks is taking place in recent months by posting, with great media coverage, a huge number of documents classified by the U.S. government In the spirit of this action lies one of the essences of journalism, public expose something that is hidden and must be known to the public. His knowledge will improve the control that citizens have the right to carry on public institutions and their managers. The reactions of the political class to the leaking of these documents has been largely of rejection and criticism. An attitude that demonstrates the discomfort of a political class that is far from democratic. Given these reactions, it seems essential to mention four features that highlight the absence of true democracy in our societies:

1 - The aversion to transparency. reaction international community to documents published by the website Wikileaks, it shows the tremendous hostility and fear that the political class has to make known the vast classified documents. Not because they make reference to politically incorrect issues that may impair diplomatic relations between countries (as well), but it shows that the authors of the cables and documentation published privately teach a behavior that is far from that held in public. This hostility shows that there are many guidelines and statements deliberately concealed to the public. Have already jumped into the open the typical statements that seek to discredit Wikileaks, is an attack on the international community, will be considered social terrorists, national security is at risk. The same was said in the 70's when the newspapers The New York Times and The Washington Post published the so-called Pentagon Papers made public the U.S. government's behavior in the Vietnam War. Time proved that none of the statements that attempted to discredit the Pentagon Papers came true.

2 - The iceberg of public actions . Behind the statements about political posturing and scheduled studied, the strategies of parties and even justice itself, a whole network of relationships involved hidden among political parties or between them and some private corporations. It is here are dissolved and / or take an important part of the decisions that affect citizens. This is simply unacceptable and reveals back-governing citizenship.

3 - Democracy is a fraud. From the moment fails to effect transparency attitudes or activities of any office or public institution, the first hit of this behavior is the institution of Democracy. The opacity should be incompatible with democracy "can be democratic without being transparent, without giving public account of what it does, says or decides? The implication of these behavior is that the democracy we practice is far from the democracy that we should complain.

4 - Politicians, the first class democracy torpedoes. If you take a brief look at the vast literature we can infer that there is a general attitude by many public officials to boycott the democratic game. A boycott becomes a real conspiracy against democracy when there is economic or commercial in question. The leaked papers show by example the lack of political will of many world leaders to reach a multilateral agreement to address climate change. (Van Rompuy: "Copenhagen was a disaster. The climate summit will not work." El País. 12/04/2010) . Or the alleged pressure by the U.S. to get the camera to file the case in Iraq killed Jose Couso, wiping out the charges involving three U.S. military. ("The English ministers are unsuccessful work to the arrest warrants." El Pais. 11/30/2010) . Also, the alleged pressure the U.S. government to end the universal jurisdiction as a result of knowing that the judge Baltazar Garzon could initiate proceedings against U.S. authorities for torturing prisoners at Guantanamo. (the "anti-American" Garzon had special monitoring. The Country. 12/02/2010)

The content of published papers shows once again what has often justly criticized the crime novel as a literary genre; company behind the window in which we live and mediocrity and numbed by the overconsumption, there are perverse behaviors that corrupt and somehow sustain it. It is the swamp or marsh, the deformed mass of behaviors and attitudes developed by public and private actors outside the visible channels of society that promote the corruption and debasement of democracy. Although Vicente Verdú type this whole morass might be expected and no big surprise contribution (Transparency transparency. The Country. 12/04/2010) make clear it is recommended to uncover the cynicism with which too many political statements are made. Now the citizens have no excuse to move against many arbitrary decisions that affect their welfare and transparency claim vigorously.

would be interesting to have something like Wikileaks in the Canaries. Help us ask ourselves the right questions: Who benefits from certain decisions made? What criteria, data or information manage to make such decisions? Why take those decisions and not others? The answers to these questions will give us access to see first hand the racks of PSC in building management companies to Santa Cruz and Tenerife, how were the actions of those who made the decisions and if they occurred as they say occurred. What would be interesting to know the method of awarding the most important infrastructures that have driven public institutions in each of the islands? Or what are the criteria that led to declare that this or that work was of general interest? And what about the way in which they agreed on CC and the PP in the previous legislature in what is called the pact for the governance of the Canaries. It would be interesting know how they got the allocation of the ministries and what agreements were taken to evict the most voted party, the Socialists from power. Or how PSOE ousted the Cabildo de Lanzarote all parties that now support their government.

We eagerly await the next revelation from Wikileaks which apparently will have to do with an American bank. It would be nice to reveal statements and actions by large financial institutions that regulate the economy and the market based on their interests, while public continue to identify the free-market economy as an instrument to achieve the welfare of people.

Photo 1: Logo WikiLeaks